The Minnesota election court has now commanded Norm Coleman to pay Al Franken $94,783.15 in itemized costs from the trial.
The Franken legal team had originally asked for $161,000, but the court rejected some of the claims as either not being sufficiently documented or not justified under the loser-pays provision of the election contest law.
But what about the "sore-loser pays double" provision? or is that something I just dreamed about? or the "horse dentures pays quadruple" provision? surely I can't have just imagined that?